Excerpts from letter D791:
May your brothers, whose mental processes have an affinity for a determined religious faith, not believe for a moment that we seek to wound them. Our judgements are objective, founded on the information we have. It is not our fault if the historical facts proceeded in this way, or if certain events suffered from literary interpolation, mystification, deformations by oral transmission, which are inevitable since they were founded on not-very-reliable mnemonic evocations... processes by which everything is transformed into myth.
But we do not invite you to believe our version, all the more since we abstain from backing up our assertions. We think that you must be careful, and that you should continue being faithful to your old ideas, if you do not understand the need to revise them through a process of evolution using rational mechanisms.
Naturally, when we arrived on OYAGAA; my brothers, once they had passed the linguistic hurdle and as soon as they began to better understand the society by learning about the culture, immediately focused their attention on the strange figure of Jesus of Galilee. It goes without saying that the other creating entities from other religions also drew their attention, some having a greater philosophico-doctrinal richness for us than the Christian religion (Socrates, Buddha, Confucius, Mahomet). The similarities between UMMOWOA and Jesus were impressive, after a first reading of the New Testament.
But there are historico-social elements which do not match. The life of Jesus appears in these books, filled with contradictions and historical errors. In addition, among the small number of historians of his time, it was impossible to find any reference to Jesus of Galilee.
We also quickly discovered that the cursory reference made to Christ by the historian Joseph is a bold interpolation carried out in later copies, by these same fanatic Christians. Joseph was unaware of or scorned this Jewish man. Three of my brothers, OAEOO 4, YU 1 and ADAA 66, travelled to Israel, Egypt and then to Jordan to collect information. Using the techniques of UWOOLOO, they were able to locate and unearth very important documents made of metal rolls, and inscriptions on stone and clay, which, along with the archaeological information collected by you, enabled us to reconstitute part of this enthralling period of your History (the archaeological documents taken from OYAGAA are on UMMO. We will return them to OYOGAA in a future stages of your cultural evolution).
Jesus was born in Galilee, not in Bethlehem, but around twelve kilometers from the town of Nazareth (NdR: Saint John claimed Jesus was born in Nazareth), in the eighth year of the Era you call Christia (and not in the first year, year zero.)
His parents were wandering pastors, and his birthplace was a modest tent. It was impossible to determine the exact location. Jesus had, at the moment of his birth, two brothers and a sister. Thereafter his parents had another son. From this point, the post-testamentary account seems filled with coarse errors, later pseudo-historical additions. Against this background, sometimes with a certain historical rigour, the doctrines of Jesus, dictated by his subconscious, were laid out.
(Note 11)- Many accounts of the life of Jesus as recorded in the New Testament are pure legends, when not strongly adulterated reflections of reality. The intense impact that his sudden disappearance generated surrounds his life with a certain supernatural halo, the strength of which elevates his most everyday actions in Palestine into marvellous events. For example: the rumour of his death was started to elude the persecution of the authorities, but passed on successively by those who had worshipped him, it was transformed into a miraculous resurrection.
Jesus did not found any Church. The account about the creation of the pope with the apostle Peter as first Pontiff, and various allusions to a congregation of faithful is also the fruit of posterior additions. Hebrew terms such as QAHAL, and the Greek EKKLESIA are then generously worked into the more ancient writings.
The myth of dead has as its origin a false interpretation of the Jesus' martyrdom. It is completely certain that this OMMIWOA was subjected to the torment of crucifixion, although the post-testamentary chronicles are appreciably deformed to the point of legend, but Jesus did not die.
His disciples managed to recover his almost inanimate body, although they made spread the story of his death to avoid another persecution.
[ Note 14 ] - Although the death of Jesus according to the documents of the New Testament and officially accepted by the Christian Churches is the least deformed historical account, the reality ((exactitude)) of the series of events exhibits many differences from the narrations transcribed in the texts you hold as sacred.
Jesus' true life in society starts when this OMMIIWOA, accompanied by a few pastors from area around Nazareth, approached a group of Essenes who followed John the Baptist. Jesus attentively follows the word of this ((religious)) leader. Many of his harangues were close to Jesus' ideological ethical conceptions. But in the end, he discovered great differences and opposed the Master publicly.
John the Baptist, worried, realized that this disciple's rhetoric was catching on with many of his other disciples and feared, quite reasonably, a serious schism that this obscure galileean could provoke among most of the group.
John reacted violently, expelling Jesus from his ranks. Most of his disciples chose to follow the new leader.
Jesus did not carry any rancour. He had, despite everything, a nostalgic memory of John the Baptist and crosses Galilee, gaining disciples who secretly see in him the future hierarch of Judaea, anointed by God.
Jesus attracted the members of the Sanhedrin (NdR: "Assembly, council made up of members of the Jewish sacerdotal nobility and Pharisian doctors, religious and civil court for all of ancient Palestine ": ROBERT - "Council of 71 members chaired by the head priest ": QUID). They were powerful and wealthy. They were more seduced by the new Master's great power of suggestion and his great eloquence than by the ethical and ideological contents of his messages. One of them: Jonan planned to deliver a blow to the Sanhedrin and eliminate the head Priest, perhaps to proclaim his new Master ((in his place))
OYAGAAWOA (Jesus) was probably unaware of of such conspiracies, although one of the documents obtained by my brothers contains a passage which leads to think that he reprehended the disciples involved in this plot and sharply admonished them.
But the rumours according to which Jesus is seen as the Messiah, that he would be crowned as the future king of Judea worried the hierarchs. They were alarmed to learn that a plot to overthrow them was in the works among his disciples.
In the camp of one of his enemies, he was accused of practising magic against Jehova, of adoring false idols, of conspiracy against the established powers, of being an impostor claiming to be the Messiah, while combining this with interpretations of the sacred texts. (The Old Testament). Of all the men in Palestine behind popular movements of religious nature, opposed the established system, Josué (Jeschuaah) i.e. Jesus Jesus was the most dangerous. During that time, Pontius Pilate (NdR: Pontius Pilatus; he who carries a javelin of honor. It is thus not the Roman prosecutor's true name) was appointed as Roman prosecutor in Judaea, thanks to Lucius' plottings. Elie Sejan (NdR: Pontius Pilate's real name?), minister of Tiberius, was a man who hated the remote Roman province of Judaea. News of disorder fomented in the popular classes had reached him. For Lucius, Pilate was the guarantee that a brutal discipline would be imposed.
Pontius Pilate arrived in Judaea and gives up residence in Cesarea. Troops were transferred to Jerusalem itself, and Pilate himself took up residence in the Holy City.
It was probably these same disciples of Jesus who pushed him to proselytize in Jerusalem, probably in the secret hope of raising the citizens against the hated Romans. At this point relations between the Master and the most activist were stressed. Tension ran very high in Jerusalem when the Roman legions entered the narrow streets of the city wearing medallions carrying the effigy of the emperor Tiberius. (the Jews hated iconographic representations, prohibited in the law of Moses). They threw stones onto the soldiers from the roofs, and the insurrectionists were brutally dealt with.
The members of the Sanhedrin were anxious. A few of their own were with and for Jesus. Pontius Pilate's spies warned him of possible revolts if Jesus continued to address to the natives of the Capital. The legend of Judas has a true basis in history. The Romans had introduced agents among the disciples of Jesus who related the Master's words to them. It was they who indicated to the Romans the most favourable opportunity to seize him.
To avoid being persecuted by the hierarchs who sought to imprison Jesus, many of his disciples had formed an army. Jesus presented himself as a saint in his spiritual harangues, and the authorities feared serious civil disorder if they attempted to imprison him.
It appears that the episode in the Garden of Gesmanie was added later and has no basis in historical fact. There is no agreement among the documents in our possession as to the circumstances of this capture, either. The most reliable text written by one of his many followers (named Joran), describes his Master as being surrounded by eighteen disciples, men and women, in the house belonging to one of the members of the Sanhedrin, himself one of the disciples (named Zhacar, or perhaps this was the council member's son).
Immediately after the evening meal, the Roman legions arrived and proceeded to arrest Jesus, acting on information obtained by the agents who betrayed Jesus.
Zhacar accompanied Jesus. Strict orders were sent to the Jewish religious authority. Zhacar and the other Sanhedrin council members argued bitterly among themselves. The schism in the Council threatened to seriously shake the religious authority directing the Temple. This is precisely what Pontius Pilate had wanted, in his strategy to divide the Jews.
The head Priest foresees the danger and orders the defendant to be delivered to the Roman authorities in order to get rid of the man whose mere presence threatened to tumble the entire Jewish community.
Pilate wished to humiliate Jesus in front of the people of Jerusalem to show them that he was not the Messiah, the envoy of God. He started by castrating him, then cauterizing the wound. It was the Roman soldiers who were responsible for these tortures. They dressed him up as a woman, covered his genital wound with a false veil and showed his body to the rabble, who laughed cruelly at the man, exhausted and nearly unconscious from repeated blows.
Somebody put a wicker cylinder with pointed spines on his head, as if to crown him.
Tired of playing with a body in acute shock, they decided on crucifixion. Jesus was actually brought to the Golgotha, not with two, but with five others. He was to be the sixth that day.
During this time certain members of the Sanhedrin were working in the background. They were the Master's disciples and they had power and influence. They bribed the Roman officer who was to execute Jesus.
That night the two soldiers on guard let three excellent disciples and two women pass, who secretly recovered Jesus' almost-dead body. It has not been possible to determine the identity of these women. We do not know if the mother of OYAAGAAWOA was still alive at this time and of she was one of the women who helped to move the Master to a safe place. The stories of Mary's interventions during the crucifixion were added later. It could be a simple fiction, but we remember that it was founded on an oral tradition, already more or less deformed.
The news that the recovered body was still alive was kept from with the other disciples. The important members of the Sanhedrin knew that there were spies among them and they feared reprisals from inflexible council members and other enemies of the Prophet, like the proconsul Pontius Pilate who, feeling that they had made a mockery of him, would have sought out Jesus the rebel everywhere.
We were able to clear up the legend according to which the number of the disciples numbered only twelve. My brothers were surprised by the contradicting versions of the story according to which Jesus was only followed by such a small number of disciples, and yet that this small group could somehow could arouse such fears for the Sanhedrin and the Romans. The archaeological documents discovered by us throw some light on the question. The myth was developed later, when twelve of his disciples formed the sect of Jerusalem, opposed to the Greek Christians. They were so bold as to claim that they were specifically chosen by Jesus.
The truth of the matter is that among the acolytes, tensions arose over the different interpretations of the Master's words. The crucifixion and false news of his death caused a division into four groups, including one led by Peter, James son of Zebediah and John, who were three of the seven minor leaders chosen by Jesus to organize his armies.
The Jerusalem group also started the myth of the betrayal by Judas Iscariote. Along with Peter and five other disciples, he was one of the most active of Jesus' followers, but with different criteria than Pierre. In the writings of the time, Judas is not only portrayed as free of any fault, but along with many of its partisans he organized revolts in the streets of Jerusalem against the Jewish hierarchs and mobs unfriendly to Jesus, while the Master's other disciples, among them Peter, fled and hid. The blackening of his name begun in the caves of Jerusalem became accepted when it could later be verified that agents paid by Rome and the head Priest had indeed inflitrated into the ranks of the Master's followers. Judas Iscariote (his name is correct), was a humble man of the people; an enemy of Jesus' rich disciples, among whom were the Sanhedrin hierarchs. When Jesus and his partisans entered Jerusalem, his group camped in the garden of Gethsemani. The evening of Jesus' capture he (Judas Iscariote) was not in the house where the last meal took place. Successive accounts of what happened during those hours have mixed together and progressively deformed over centuries, until the legend of Jesus praying in the garden of Gethsemami was created. An emissary arrived at Judas' tent with the news of the Master's arrest. Judas reprimanded his hosts and left abruptly, running through the city's narrow streets while Jesus was being brutally tortured. Judas was arrested, beaten and his corpse hanged. The other lieutenants secretly left the capital.
Recently arrived on OYAGAA, my brothers worked out a hypothesis according to which Jesus would be a true OMMIIWOA, as it was later confirmed, but they thought incorrectly that his ASNEEIIBIAEDOO (disappearance by boundary effect), had happened at the time of his death on the cross, making the later resurrection account a legend raised to mythical status in the Gospels.
As you can see, with the hindsight gained by additional documentation, this hypothesis can be disproved.
We are sorry to have to separate ourselves from the distinct historical schools developed by your brothers on Earth. The mythological school, whose historians have developed an excellent body of work in the Soviet Union, is incorrect in denying the existence of Jesus.
The historical school (represented by your brothers Renan, Loisy, Staton, Bultman) is closer to the truth, but for lack of documents, they struggle in the darkness. The school represented by the historians connected to the church can be completely discredited because they are trying to develop a christian pseudo-history based on texts which your own critical spirit would regard as being loaded with mythical elements.
All your brothers of different schools of thought, motivated by good faith but lacking sufficient information, struggle in doubt. Our contributions will not really help you, especially since we refuse to bring forward the evidence that we have. To do so would suppose that we are obliged to identify ourselves as OEMMI of UMMO.
They looked after his wounds and once he was rehabilitated, the religious chief began his doctrinary activity once again. Not long after the ASNEEIIBIAEDOO (disappearance) occured, in front of his astonished disciples. The account of this event then was deformed and interpreted as "ascension. "The phenomenon did not appear so astonishing to the fanatical humans, convinced of the Divinity of their Master. We proved that the shroud preserved in Turin did indeed cover the body of Jesus. We recommend that you study thoroughly this vestige of history. The vaporigraphic thesis, according to which the fabric would have been impregnated with the same phytotherapeutic substances used Jesus' followers to heal his wounds, explains the imprint of the image. The hypothesis that some of your brothers put forward about a mysterious radiation is completely absurd and anti-scientific. The shroud was preserved by a peasant named ISMAHI, which was present at the "miraculous disappearance "of the Galilean Master.
It is important to note that contrary to our history of UMMOWOA, the number of people present at the extraordinary event of his disappearance was enormous. It is possible, according to the documents we have obtained, that there were twelve hundred to fifteen hundred people present. If the version given in the beginning by a few disciples was described as psycho-nosological (NdR: nosology: "the study of distinct characteristics making it possible to diagnose diseases") by those who heard the account, though an investigation later restored the event to the level of a phenomenon, here hundreds of pastors, peasants and fishermen filled with an exalted fanaticism went forth with mystical enthusiasm to relate what they had seen with their own eyes.
[ Note 15 ] - Although the ideological environment of these humans was filled with superstitions about the magical abilities of prophets and wizards, people had never seen anything more than simple tricks of sleight of hand. The instantaneous disappearance of a human being in broad daylight, must have been profoundly surprising.
A Christian sect materialized almost immediately, at its peak in the year 38 (Western Era), and lasting until 129 to 133. During this time, the people who had witnessed the event, their sons and other exalted followers, confronted the dominant doctrines in Israel, and launched out into a Messianic campaign to spread Jesus' already somewhat faded ethical doctrines.
From this date, the first divisions are visible, the formation; the beginning of the EKKLESIA congregation - inspired by the more ambitious leaders - begins in force.
During his life, Jesus had befriended the remarkable people directing assemblies and synagogues. Remember that in Judaea the richest and most eminent men were integrated into the sacerdotal class; i.e., dignitaries of the Supreme Priesthood of the Temple. The flow of money was immense, coming from gifts made by Jews and religious taxes. In this way, the Sanhedrin could rely on a secret power extending to the far reaches of Judaea.
Some of these eminent men had secretly converted to Jesus' doctrine and they were present at the disappearance. Thanks to their material wealth, they worked to form these sects, also indirectly through their children and grandchildren.
At the beginning, two important groups emerged. One springing from (minority) Jewish sects and the other from Palestinian Social Networks (though in a certain way based on Judaism). A group of Essenes also comes to be, deforming the doctrines appreciably. An eminent role was later played by the descendants of a sect which had embraced a form of monastic life, formed by some of Jesus' friends, and who lived in caves close to Jerusalem.
Differences of opinion on the significance Jesus' ideas became more tense. Only one common memory tied these people together: their fathers or grandfathers had witnessed the wonder of a divine Master
The idea of a church appears, propounded by a strongly hierarchical group of Jerusalem monks. Among them were former disciples of another historical OEMMII (although his history is equally distorted), John the Baptist.
[ Note 16 ] - John the Baptist plays a very important historical role in the life of OYAGAAWOA (Jesus). It was a sad and dramatic period for the Jewish people under the yoke of the pagan Romans who ideologically were far behind the monotheist Jews.
Long before, the expulsion of hierarchs bearing the name of Herod had begun, and the people felt hatred and loathing. Herod son of Antiphatrus had offered his services to Octavius in Rome, and he came to Judaea with his armies who finally dealt the defenders of Jerusalem a crushing defeat, imposing a new Sanhedrin having at its head the new head priest Aristobulus, young relative of Herod, proclaiming himself King of Judaea with the support of Rome.
The upper classes supported him since Herod, who had been educated in Rome, planned out the country intelligently and inaugurated an era of new construction based on Roman architectural methods. But the popular classes hated him. They saw him as a traitor who had sold their identity of proud tradition to the barbarian invaders from the Italian peninsula.
Years later, rebels opposed to the neuropsychic spirit of the chiefs started going around as prophets, preaching the end of time as interpreted in the light of the sacred texts.
John was the most intelligent and the best-known of them. Fanatics, essenes and Samaritans followed him.
At that time, one of Hérod's descendants, Antipas, exacerbated the situation and angered the peasants, pastors, craftsmen and fishermen. He decided to marry his niece by blood. The puritanical law of Moses considered this to be incestuous, reprehensible and horrible. Jean the Baptist exhorted those who would listen to purify their body in water, organize an uprising and kill the hierarchs damned by Jehova.
Among John's very first disciples was Jesus. He was attracted to the purer ideas preached by his Master, who advocated a return to a purer life and a more faithful interpretation of the law of Moses.
Jesus was much more intelligent than John, and much more persuasive as well. Many of the Master's followers focused their attention on the young man. Jesus openly opposed John when he started to preach the assassination of Herod and other Jewish hierarchs. John reacted by expelling him, and Jesus took a great number of followers with him.
These various disciples (NdR : Sect of John the Baptist) imposed what is called the sacrament of baptism. It is the same sect which created the myth of the twelve apostles. Not that they did not exist, some were among the disciples of Jesus, others belonged to a group of anchorites, but historically they have come to be looked upon as protagonists, which was not really the case. They would be the SHELIHIM, the leaders of the new hierarchical congregation. A group of highly-cultured Jews embracing Jesus' already very faded doctrines formed another sect, called the hellenists, with Esteban as its leader. The conflicts between them and the old monacal group became very serious. The hellenists based their ideology on the idea that it was necessary to suffer persecution and martyrdom, as Jesus had. Their dialectic was richer, they were for the most part more intelligent than the monks. The ZELOT had terrible disagreements with them which degenerated into bloody conflicts. Esteban was savagely assassinated. They castrated him alive, tore out his eyes and opened his abdomen. Then, according to the other members of the sect, Esteban was executed.
The remainder of the partisans fled to Samaria. The hellenists continued to spread out across the coast of the Mediterranean, in Syria, in Phonecia. Ecclesiastical congregations were formed along these theological lines, entering into competition with the monks who in theory (sic) ((originally: ' Al principio' instead of ' in principio '), had been sponsored by the twelve.
An obscure OEMMII by the name of Paul of Tarsus distinguished himself during the persecution of the hellenists. In theory, he belonged to the Zelotas. Then, he betrayed them and they swore to kill him. A hellenist named THAIS initiated him into the mysteries of Jesus' doctrines. THAIS had also witnessed the disappearance of Jesus. After his integration into the group, he travelled to Syria to create new groups, new churches.
In these communities there was a strong respect for the freedom of the followers. The rigid hierarchies, severe regulations and paralyzed communities so manifest in later centuries were unknown. The faithful were admonished to regulate their behaviour according to the Jesus' divine teachings, so as not to seriously impinge on the weakest beings' rights. Here the true UAA emerges in all its purity.
Until the year 49, the Zelotas caused serious disorder in Jerusalem. The origin of the revolt can be traced to the savage rape of a young Zelota woman by a Roman soldier. The rebellion spread to all of Palestine. Rome reached the end of its patience with the rebels, occupying Jerusalem and destroying the Temple. The Christian sects were seriously affected during this time.
Later James died, and the Jerusalem sect dispersed. Until 72, the influence it wielded declined noticeably.
During this time the hellenists groups continued to reform. They wrote what is called the Gospel according to Saint Mark until the year 52, and they spread it quickly.
On the coast, an exile by the name of NAUR wrote the Apocalypse in the year 79. This man hated the Jews and he wrote this text to add fuel to the social climate in Palestine against their race.
What you call (Epistles?) was written between 78 and 81. We can tell you that it is not written by James either. It is the work of two authors, of called Daniel the Jew, both trying to bring the Jews dispersed after the Temple of Jerusalem's destruction to Christianity by their text.
The Gospel according to Saint Matthew was written in 82, remaining hidden for two years, then was rewritten with corrections in 84 by a small group of hierarchs in a community of Syria, located at Antioch.
The history of the Gospel according to Saint John is more complex. It is John precisely who tells of Jesus' anguish and his life, as he would have known it through adulterated versions from other disciples of Jesus, and as he lived it itself, from various followers of Smyrna. They collected the oral accounts and wrote the Gospel from memory, which they did not make known before three more final improvements. The Gospel only took on its final form after two years and five months. And they began to reveal the text in 96.
During the end of the first century, the Christians met in the homes of the sects' most eminent leaders. They would participate in re-enactments of the last supper, remembering the Master Jesus, reading accounts of his death. This custom continued to be ritualised until the first quarter of the 2nd century (year 118) when the Eucharist reached the status of sacrament. The elders carried out the services which had already been ritualized and even codified in certain communities. The bishops undertook the management of a Common Fund from the congregations. Finally, it was done by the communities.
The interim period between 170 and 243 is characterized by the birth of the Institution of the church. The bishops understood that the dispersed communities should be linked under a common control and a uniform doctrine, which had been hitherto exposed in an anarchistic fashion by each independent congregation.
[ Note 12 ] - Much of these first Christian communities were a marvellous model of a Social Network founded on moral models. They practised the sharing of of goods, and the members who always had the venerated image of the sublime Master Jesus present in their minds put his noble lessons into practice. It did not matter that the doctrines were already deformed through a historical mythification of the Master's life. What was important was that according to the information we have, they practised a way of life among themselves resembling the ethical basis which govern the habits of our UMMO.
It is primarily for this reason that the Western civilization of OYAGAA largely intrigued us. Not because the scientific rationalism around which it revolves is constituted from the forms of Greek thought, nor because those nations have reached a level of economic well-being in connection with the technological developments resulting from that planning, rectilinear mentality, nor because of their religious ideologies. Actually, the religion structured around Christianity has a much less imaginative theology than hinduism, Buddhism and other exotic forms of transcendental thought.
So why are we ((initially)) interested in this part of the social network? Simply because of the incomprehensible, brutal contradictions that exist within religious communities of Judeo-Christian origin.
If we look at Catholicism, it is disconcerting how the OEMMII, whose codes of behaviour are regulated by a most sublime moral law, have sometimes given their lives to the service of their brothers, while your more fanatical brothers who have carried out acts of unspeakable cruelty in the name of Jesus. It is no secret that within the framework of this institutionalized religion, the pages of your history are stained with the blood and suffering of those who did not think like you, but there is also kindness and charity. You would probably say that Catholicism is a saga of angels and demons.
A study that we conducted tended towards the negative side of this balance. The ecclesia phenomenon has been responsible for more evil than good for the humanity of OYAGAA. It slowed down the development of Science and Culture, it suppressed the thirst for emancipation from poverty and slavery.
It is unnecessary that we point out many dark passages.
Initially, the communities of a few cities were authentic models of behavior on the ethical level and Christians of many groups suffered terrible persecution, of inhuman torture, ((thus)) revealing the true natur of their FAITH.
But constantinism destroyed the last vestiges of a social network founded on Community and ethical principles.
The most serious thing is not that it was structured according to the myth of the primat Peter, ordering his organisation on a hierarchical basis and structuring its doctrines dogmatically. What has truly corrupted the church was temporal power and the paranoid ideas of dignitaries and theologians.
The old demon myth plagiarized from the ' biblical ' texts of other ancestral religions of OYOGAA was picked up with great intensity by the thinkers of this institution, for it enabled them to justify their abominable mode of conduct.
Thus thousands of poor women were persecuted, having been accused of dealing with the devil, in a nauseating persecution that divided Catholic and Protestant Christians during the darkest centuries of your history.
All the assassinations by the fanatics (the night of Saint Barthelemy, the Gironde massacre, the genocide of the priest Ante Palevic who collaborated with the Nazis, the death of Giordano Bruno, the tortures and crimes of the pro-Franco Spanish, horrible tortures supported by the Catholic hierarchy of Argentinian soldiers), were justified according to the morals of the church under the pretext that the victims were trying (in collaboration with diabolical forces) to reverse the established order.
This Church is thus guilty of perverting Jesus' message, of removing his credibility and consequently preventing a process of ' mentalisation' of the social Network which would enable it to follow the UAA. When OEMMII filled with kindness, eager to follow Jesus' pure doctrines claimed, even from within the heart of the structure, to reform the church; the system either created an airtight barrier to isolate them, or else simply eliminated them.
You could choose many examples. Francis of Assisi, John XXII, the archbishop Romero, founders of the theological doctrines of the Liberation, and the unbelievable case of your brother Abino (John Paul I), assassinated with a double dose of a botulinic agent and potassium cyanide, when he proposed that the people in charge of finances keep strict accounts, and when he was on the verge of launching his new plan (Carpeta azul Documento S/655) for a major reform of the economy.
Your brothers already witnessed the disintegration of naive hopes for an already tainted structure to be restored by returning to the primitive texts of the Gospel after the explosion of the Council of Vatican II. The Sovereign-Pontiff Jean Paul II undertook to make it fall through. The anticlerics should be very grateful towards him. In a few years he has done more damage to his church than all its atheist enemies.
But the groups were not all favorable to this fusion advocated by the bishops
Actually the sect known as "Christian" was divided into a multitude of splinter groups, some, according to an eclectic line of thought, combining Greek and Roman mythology with Christianity, when not attempting a a strange symbiosis of Jewish, Egyptian and Christian ideas. The most important group opposed to this other line of thinking was that formed by the gnostic schools. It is a more purified way of understanding Christianity.
The falsified official historical interpretation put forth by Roman Catholic historians underscores the conflict between the two ideologies. One represented by CHRISTIANITY (at its origins JERUSALEMIC and HELLENIC), and the other by a quasi-pagan sect called GNOSTICISM.
The historical reality, according to documents we have secured, is very different.
They are two mythical interpretations of Christianity. Both modify Jesus' original message, whose cosmobiologic origin we outlined perviously. Influenced by the models of neguentropic behaviour so present in his subconscious, Jesus wanted to teach these simple elements of Ethics to his disciples.
The mentality of magic, exotic beliefs stemming from various mythological cultures and the natural absence of rigour in the oral or written way of passing down information gave rise to two "Christian" doctrinal schools: Greek, the poorer, influenced more by the frightening concept of a vengeful and cruel Jehova, protector of the aggressive Jews, and Gnostic, having a more logical philosophy which sees in Jehova a clever being and describes a much purer idea of God.
Later history proved to be a brutal shock between the two ideas. Finally the first model, which imposed its concept of the Church and its doctrines, won out. It seems obvious that if the reverse were true, you in the West would have worked out a Christian philosophy, also distorted and based on myth, but more intellectual and whose concept of the divinity would be more scientific.
Note and summary of D 491, "Denounciation of an act of fraud concerning the Holy Shroud, " opened in November 1988
There are in fact two letters, one in Spanish 4 pages long, very well documented, the other covering the same subject, but different in its form (summarized on one page), in English.
We did not reproduce these letters, poorly written or poorly translated.
The Ummite writer informs us that an act of fraud occurred and that true Holy Shroud was removed by some Prelates of the Catholic church and replaced by a forgery, manufactured in November 1927, because the original had blood stains on it. Why did the blood stains worry the church? Quite simply because a corpse does not bleed and so this Shroud was proof that Christ did not die on the cross, but, as indicated in the letter above, had been saved by his disciples, before his death.